Monday, 5 May 2008   

 
 

DEVELOPMENT: FOOD CRISIS TO FOREFRONT AT AsDB SESSIONS
Marwaan Macan-Markar

MADRID (IPS) - Three words -- high food prices -- emerged like a gatecrasher at an event hosted by the Asian Development Bank (AsDB) here that was originally billed as a celebration of the bank’s new vision for poverty eradication in Asia.

Participants at the event discussed the AsDB’s ‘Strategy 2020’ -- the long- term strategic framework (LTSF) for the 2008-2020 period -- and raised the alarm about the current global food crisis. It is a reality that the bank cannot ignore, they said, in light of the millions who could be condemned to a life of hunger and poverty in the region.

"The rising food prices are a threat to food security and a threat to poverty reduction, and we stress that food security must be adopted as a challenge of the LTSF," D. Subba Rao, secretary of India’s finance ministry, said during a Sunday morning seminar for the central bank governors of the AsDB’s 67 member countries.

"The food crisis cannot be remedied through emergency measures. We have to put back money in rural development," added Supachai Panitchpakdi, secretary general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).

They were comments echoed by a ranking finance official from Bangladesh, who said that "the food problem is not a cyclical problem but a structural problem."

Such concerns exposed a deep flaw in the bank’s new quest to direct development in Asia. The LTSF makes little reference to aiding the continent’s agriculture sector in the rural areas -- home to a majority of the 600 million Asians living in absolute poverty, on less the one dollar a day.

The LTSF, which was approved in March, places stress on five "drivers of change" to achieve "An Asia and Pacific free of poverty" by 2020. These drivers are: private sector development and private sector operations, good governance and capacity development, gender equity, knowledge solutions and partnerships. In addition, "inclusive growth, environmentally sustainable growth and regional integration" will feature as the bank’s "three strategic agendas."

Consequently, Haruhiko Kuroda, the bank’s president, was forced to admit this lapse by an institution that, for over 40 years, has been the premier lender of grants and loans for development in the Asia-Pacific region. "As you look at the LTSF, certainly the five core areas do not include agriculture. But there is a paragraph about agriculture [in the text]," he said during the seminar. "ADB can support agriculture through infrastructure, rural roads as well as rural finance," he said.

The tone of greater interest in the food scarcity than what the LTSF provides for was set on Saturday, the opening day of the AsDB’s 41st annual meeting of its governing board, which runs from May 3 to 6. During a late morning press conference, most of the questions Kuroda had to field were on food shortages. The bank, itself, released a 15-page paper on the subject, ‘Soaring Food Prices – Response to the Crisis’.

The annual meeting has attracted over 3,000 participants, ranging from finance ministers and central bank governors, to industrialists, bankers, academics and civil society activists.

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are hardly surprised by the dilemma the AsDB faces at this meeting, which was meant to showcase the virtues of the LTSF. "The food crisis has overshadowed the message that the ADB wanted to send out of this meeting," says Mishka Zaman, Asia programme manager of the Bank Information Centre (BIC), a development watchdog based in Washington D.C. "The concerns about food security has relegated the LTSF into a corner."

The concerns raised about the LTSF reveal its "lack of focus on rural areas, on agriculture," she added in an interview. "It shows that the LTSF is devoid of the reality that we see in the region."

The bank could not have done more damage to its relevance in Asia as a result of this clear shift away from assisting the agriculture sector, Isangani Serrano, vice president of the Phili (END)







   
   












The contents of this news coverage, including any funded by the European Union, are the sole responsibility of IPS and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.